Co-production practitioners network
A network for co-production practitioners
I recently attended an event at which someone from a public sector organisation was talking about some future developments. In the course of this talk, she kept referring to local residents as 'customers' , and talking about 'customer service'. It occurred to me that, if we are to make progress with co-production, we need to move beyond this 'customer' mentality, this perception of local residents as 'customers' of services provided by public sector agencies, and we need to move instead to perceiving local residents as active citizens with whom we can - and perhaps should - be working to co-produce projects and, through that, more importantly, to co-produce wellbeing outcomes. I'd be interested to hear of anyone else's thoughts/ideas on this.
Add a Comment
Edgar Cahn, who has informed a lot of nef's thinking on co-production once said, if you call people customers of public services you only give them two roles, to consume more or to complain. Customer in the money economy is seen as a strong position, assuming you have status related to how you chose to spend your cash, with people competing for your 'business'. But this does not translate well into a public service economy. Here we don't want people to be consumers, we want them to be contributors, with a stake in the final results. Whilst talking about people as 'customers' is better than ignoring them completely, or expecting them to be grateful recipients of services, it will be a dead end in relation to creating opportunities for co-production.
© 2024 Created by Lucie Stephens. Powered by
You need to be a member of Co-production practitioners network to add comments!
Join Co-production practitioners network